The event was advertised as the Fire Conference at which Pastor Benny Hinn would share powerful insights from God’s Word. Being a seminary student, curious Christian, and interested interlocutor of the Word, “powerful insights from God’s Word” is something I am most definitely interested in. However, attending the Fire Conference proved to shed light not on God’s Word but the fundraising techniques of popular televangelist Benny Hinn.

The evening started a few minutes off schedule with a video featuring orphanages from Mexico and the Philippines for which Benny Hinn Ministries and their partners graciously provide with money and prayer support. The overarching theme of the video was that peoples’ money has gone to establishing orphanages and spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ. Repeatedly the number 45,000 was given as the total number of orphans who are currently benefiting from the work of Benny Hinn Ministries.

After the video, a financial advisor turned financial redeemer, entered the stage to share the twofold gospel: Jesus’ person and his principles. “Why do men such as Bill Gates who are not Christians but extremely wealthy prosper like they do?” Todd contends that it is because they follow Jesus’ fixed principles of wealth of which anyone, Christian or otherwise, can take advantage. In essence, the god who emerges is not that different from his Son’s principles: know the principles, apply the principles, and reap the benefits of the principles automatically. It is turns out rather mechanistic and impersonal. God is the transcendent wish dispenser who will grant all your wildest dreams when you insert the coinage of faith as in a soda machine. As impersonal principles like gravity automatically respond so too does God. “Your faith decides divine timing” quickly became a popular maxim of the conference. Said plainly, you receive from the mechanistic god what you will when you insert what he wills: faith.

Moreover, characteristic of the god who emerges is not an interest in personal holiness and sanctification but an interest in providing wealth. Why then is that? “For you can’t preach the gospel without money.” The gospel cannot go out without money therefore God desires all to be wealthy so that the gospel can proceed. And we’re not talking metaphorically and symbolically of being wealthy in love for God and others; we’re talking cash. “I’m not going to be the one to tell you to be satisfied with what you have.” But God might.

Insights from God’s Word?

So, for a conference which promised to share insights from God’s Word, which passages were preached? That’s kind of a difficult question to answer because only short Scripture snippets were quoted randomly as opposed to a particular passage being worked through in an expository fashion. But, let me now try to remember which passages made the headlines. On an interesting note, before turning to the passages themselves, it is worth noting that all Scripture quotations and references were taken from what sounded like the King James Version. It would be interesting to find out if the speakers feel that this translation in particular adds additional emphasis to Scripture. In other words, if they feel it sounds more authoritative; how they most definitely would want to sound given that they’re encouraging the audience to hand their money over into their care. Now the verses.

The first that I can recall is “seedtime harvest shall always be on the earth” which was said to be from Genesis 8. Indeed it is Genesis 8, verse 22 to be exact, which in the English Standard Version reads: “While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, day and night, shall not cease.” The context into which this passage was imported had to do with Jesus’ principle of sowing (inserting the coinage of faith) which I mentioned above. With this passage the speaker was corroborating his understanding that the principle(s) which God has fixed concerning wealth will always yield, not just generic wealth but especially that for which you specifically ask. I think this notion is known as Seedtime Theology. The biblical context of this passage will most likely be familiar to many: Noah’s ark and the flood. Indeed, God is speaking here of promise. In verse 21 he says “I will never again curse the ground because of man, for the intention of man’s heart is evil from his youth. Neither will I ever again strike down every living creature as I have done.” The Lord’s promise here loudly bespeaks his gracious dealings with sinful humanity in that even though our intentions are evil from youth, he will allow time and space for us to repent. Further, he will never again curse the ground because of man, but will punish man because of man in the judgment. His promise is not only to man but also concerns the earth. What then is herein emphasized is not wealth from impersonal principles but the gracious of God juxtaposed to the radical depravity of man. In conclusion, we should be forced to our knees to beg for mercy from the Lord from this passage not led to demand material wealth. He is providing for us in allowing the earth to continue to do its thing (grow seeds, yield harvest, heat up and cool down, etc.) even while our sinfulness wrecks his creation. While most assuredly more is going on in this chapter of Genesis, what I have described shouldn’t be missed, and to leave the context behind is to reinforce unbiblical presuppositions of wealth gaining.

The second Scripture that I can recall is Luke 10:2 which says “And he said to them, ‘The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few. Therefore pray earnestly to the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into his harvest.’” This was imported with the simple phrase “He is the Lord of the harvest,” here again meaning that to sow to him by sowing a “thousand dollar seed of faith” is to insure a harvest because he is the “Lord of the harvest.” The context of Luke 10 is vital to uprooting such extra-biblical thinking for here Christ is speaking of salvation and laboring to that end, not wealth or planting seeds of faith. Frightening (lack of) exegesis.

Fundraiser

It is for these reasons and more that I refer to Benny Hinn’s Fire Conference as Benny Hinn’s Raleigh fundraiser. Powerful insights from God’s Word were not shared. The audience was, in the main, exhorted to give, to sow a seed of faith while the preaching of the gospel was neglected.

Tip of the Ice Berg

Lamentably, more could be said: the undoubted morning-after crisis of faith by many givers, the ease with which the audience was duped, the shame of having a packed out auditorium and not exhorting sinners to turn to Christ in faith for the forgiveness of sins, poor theology proper presented (the mechanistic god), and more; but I shall draw to a close here.