Language Myth: Primitive Languages

by

2 minutes

An unwritten language (a language without a writing system) is obviously more primitive than a language that has a writing system, right? Wrong. It’s a common misconception to think that a language is somehow more primitive than another simply because it does not have a system in place to write its language down. Cultural complexity is a different story,[1. E.g., the difference in complexity of say hunter-gatherers and a globalized economy.] but when it comes to linguistic development no language can really be considered “primitive.” Claiming that one language is more primitive than another is tantamount to saying one people group is more biologically evolved than another. But we’re all human and come out with equally complex native linguistic abilities.

So what is it about a certain language, apart from lacking a writing system, that would make us feel like it is more primitive? How about its sounds. Do you, for example, consider the so-called African clicks on par with the sounds that you make when you speak English or Spanish or French? No, these clicks sound rather “inarticulate” to native English speakers because we don’t and many of us can’t make them. But “[s]uch a view is based on the ethnocentric attitude that the characteristics of one’s own language are obviously superior.”[1. Zdenek Salzmann, Language, Culture, and Society: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology, 4th ed. (Cambridge, MA: Westview Press, 2007), 16.] A child, however, can easily learn to make and utilize these sounds from a very young age, clicking away like it’s nothing difficult. Just because we are unable to do so or it strikes our ears as strange does not make such a sound primitive or inferior.

Language is a gift from God for humanity to use to accomplish all sorts of tasks and especially to live lives that are pleasing to him. We are blessed to be able to articulate our thoughts, desires and pains. Each human speaks a language whether it be written or unwritten, voiced or signed, shared by many or shared by few; it’s still a language that accomplishes just what its speakers want it to. None are primitive.

Rusty Rim
Creative Commons License photo credit: Grums

4 responses to “Language Myth: Primitive Languages”

  1. wlh Avatar

    Drew,

    As always, well done! Have you read the work by Salzmann in its entirety to be able to give a recommendation of it? I am very interested in the intersection between language and worldview, and apart from enrolling in a ethnoliguistic or anthropological linguistics program (like at U.of Chicago), I’m looking for a non-theological starting point for my reading. I would love your feedback.

    -Wes

    1. drew Avatar

      Howdy, Wes! You may want to get this from the library after me. I haven’t read through it completely yet but chapter three is devoted to language and culture and he discusses your area of interest. As far as the intersection of language and worldview goes you’re going to want to be familiar with the work of Benjamin Lee Whorf and Edward Sapir, especially the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. This area of linguistics (linguistic determinism) is hotly contested.

      I would recommend this book. I think you’d find it well worth your time. I know I do. It will give you a very nice start and introduction to the issues involved.

  2. wlh Avatar

    drew,

    Thanks bro!

    -Wes

  3. Ched Avatar

    I like your thoughts here.

    I think that much conceptual bias is generated by how a language sounds to someone who doesn’t speak it.

    It’s also an easy way to disregard automatically the intelligence of an unfamiliar person or people group.

CommentsOnToast

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from MaustsOnToast

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading